Master List
Volume 5
Number 1
Spring 1999
 IN THIS ISSUE
How Good
Is Our Mouse Trap?
Helical Chest CT
in the Diagnosis of Acute
Pulmonary Embolism
FAQs

Helical Chest CT
Transcatheter Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

How Good Is Our Mouse Trap?
A modern hospital, to paraphrase John Steinbeck, is like a colonial animal. Its efficient operation results from a complex interdependence of its many units, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. It is very important for every one dependent on a unit to know these strengths and weaknesses, so that the weaknesses may be avoided and strengths exploited, resulting in a higher efficiency and smoother operation. A radiology department is an important part of any hospital and successful patient management often depends on what this department can and can not do well. Therefore, we felt that the readers of this publication will benefit from perodic descriptions of what we in this department excel in and also what we are weak at, as well as describing our local experiences with evolving and well established technologies. We feel that the latter is particularly important for the advancement of the entire institution. We sincerely hope this experiment will be of value. In this issue we present the first of this series of articles, addressing the current role and our experience with the use of helical CT of the chest in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism.


Helical Chest CT in the diagnosis of acute Pulmonary Embolism           Hrudaya Nath, MD, Mitchell Olman, MD

Acute pulmonary embolism (PTE) is a common disease and if left untreated leads to significant morbidity and mortality. It is estimated that more than 500,000 episodes of pulmonary embolism occur each year in this country, accounting for 50,000 deaths annually. Antemortem diagnosis of PTE is significantly lower and it is estimated that fewer than 30% of PTE found at autopsy were suspected during life. PTE is a treatable condition; however, its treatment, anticoagulation, carries its own significant morbidity and mortality.

The highly variable and heterogeneous clinical syndrome of PTE results in its underdiagnosis. Imaging plays a key role in its diagnosis. Pulmonary angiography is considered as the gold standard for the 'in vivo' diagnosis of PTE; however, the test is expensive, invasive and is universally underutilized, including in our own institution. Also, its interpretation in cases with minimal (involving only the subsegmental arteries) PTE is less definitive. Radionuclide V/Q scanning is traditionally considered as the primary screening method for PTE, and this is a time tested method. Based on the results of PIOPED data, high probability scans have ~ 90% concordance with angiographically positive PTE. A normal V/Q scan has negligible incidence of PTE. Low probability scans have about 10% reported incidence of angiographically positive PTE. However, this technique has several problems, including the inability to obtain ventilation scans in intubated patients (e.g., ICU patients on ventilators). The most important limitation is the approximately 35-50 % incidence of 'indeterminate' probability scans. In this large subset of patients only about a third have angiographically positive PTE, and another imaging test is necessary to identify patients with true positive PTE so that an excessive number of patients do not receive needless anticoagulation. Ultrasound examination of the veins of the lower extremity was introduced as an ancilliary test following the realization that the PTE is a marker for venous thromboembolism and these emboli to the lungs arise most commonly from the lower extremity veins. However, the incidence of a positive examination is very low in the absence of clinical symptomatology of deep venous thrombosis, a figure of about 10% in our department.

The problem with the interpretation of V/Q scanning is caused by the 'inference' of PTE based on ventilation/perfusion mismatch and not the demonstration of the intravascular clot; hence, the superiority of pulmonary angiography which actually demonstrates the clot. Helical chest CT (HCCT) following rapid intravenous injection of contrast material is a modification of the conventional chest CT in which with software and hardware modifications, a volumetric data acquisition takes place allowing faster scan acquisition and subsequent image manipulation. Several recent studies have shown that this method provides an excellent, but not a perfect demonstration of the pulmonary arteries and the presence of an intravascular thrombus (fig). The technique has shown promise in many studies published since 1996. The sensitivity of the CT in detecting PTE ranged from 85%-90% and the specificity was more than 90%. Most of the missed emboli were in the subsegmental vessels. There is some consensus that these isolated subsegmental emboli in patients with adequate cardiopulmonary reserve and absence of deep venous thrombosis may not be clinically significant, thus making it possible to use HCCT either as a screening test (instead of V/Q scanning) or to replace pulmonary angiography in selected patients. In a study published in 1997, a cohort of 140 patients had HCCT and V/Q scanning among which 46 patients had proven PTE. HCCT identified more PTE (85% vs 67%) than V/Q scan and they were equally specific (95% vs 94%). In 20 cases V/Q scan results were indeterminate, and among these HCCT correctly identified emboli in five, excluded emboli in eleven and falsely diagnosed PTE in two. In another study published in 1997, 164 consecutive patients with indeterminate V/Q scan, and negative venous US were studied by HCCT. PTE was found in 39 patients at HCCT and pulmonary angiography in one who had a negative HCCT. All of the other patients had clinical follow up for three months. Three patients subsequently developed DVT who may have had PTE during the episode of indeterminate V/Q scan; two additional patients suffered PTE during the follow up. Thus HCCT missed thromboembolism in six patients (5.4% [95% confidence interval 9.7%]).

Because of the above background, we embarked on evaluating HCCT for the detection and screening of PTE. Two separate groups of patients are being evaluated. In an ongoing, prospective, randomized study (Investigators: MA Olman, Hrudaya Nath, KM Willie, JA Ball), patients are randomized to either V/Q scanning or HCCT. If the screening test is not positive for PTE, the patient has US examination of the lower extremity veins for DVT. If that is also negative and the patient has normal cardiopulmonary reserve, a follow up US examination is performed within 10 days and a clinical follow up at three and six months. If the cardiopulmonary reserve (CPR) is inadequate, a pulmonary angiogram is performed. So far, 60 patients have been randomized and completed six month followup (the target number of patients is 200). Thus far, the frequency of positive initial evaluation is equal (12%) for both the HCCT and V/Q scan groups. In the patients with good CPR 25/44 (56%) underwent HCCT and 19/44 (43%) had V/Q scanning. There have been three deaths in the HCCT group, none of which was attributable to PTE. There have been no deaths nor recurrence of PTE or DVT in the V/Q scan group. In the patients with poor CPR (n=18), there has been 1 death, possibly attributable to PTE in the CT group and none in the radionuclide group.

Fig 1.HCCT scan at the level of left main pulmonary artery. There are multiple intraluminal filling defects in the left pulmonary artery (arrows), extending into the lower lobe..

Fig 2. HCCT scan at the level of the right lower lobe branch. The embolus in the lower lobar artery is well seen (arrow).

In another study of patients in surgical and trauma/burn ICU (Investigators: A May, H Nath, G Vangelisi), 22 consecutive patients with suspected acute PTE were investigated with HCCT between 8/1997 and 7/1998. This group of patients are difficult to screen using V/Q scans because of the often abnormal chest radiographs and the inability to obtain ventilation scans because the patients are ventilator dependent. The HCCT was positive for PTE in four patients, one of which was corroborated with a high probability V/Q scan. It was suggestive in one patient, but a pulmonary angiogram was normal. The HCCT was negative in 17 patients. In one patient, the negative finding was proven by a pulmonary angiogram. Lower extremity US examination was performed in 8/17 patients, all of which were normal. In 11/17 patients unexpected findings were found on the HCCT, including pneumonia, large pleural effusions, ARDS and hemopericardium. These findings influenced treatment decisions in six. The average hospital stay of these 17 patients was 64.34 days, during which time they did not develop PTE or DVT.

These two studies bolster our confidence in the use of HCCT for screening and diagnosis of acute PTE. We therefore propose the following process for choosing HCCT in clinical practice, based on the patient's cardiopulmonary status and the presence of pulmonary and/or pleural abnormalities on the chest radiographs that may interfere with interpretation of V/Q scans. The randomized trial in progress at UAB is specifically designed to validate the recommendations given below, and we solicit your help in recruiting patients for this study:

1. Results of theV/Q scans (high probability or normal scans) are more likely to be definitive in patients with normal chest radiographs, no major heart or lung disease and adequate CPR. Therefore, these patients should have V/Q scan as the initial screening test. If the V/Q scan is indeterminate or low probability and the result discordant with the clinical probability of PTE, additional imaging such as US examination for DVT or pulmonary angiography may be indicated.

2. In patients with adequate cardiopulmonary function, but with abnormal chest radiographs, V/Q scanning is less likely to provide a definitive answer and this group of patients are more likely to benefit from HCCT. If the patient also has suspected DVT we suggest beginning with sonography of the veins. In the others the initial test should be HCCT; a negative scan should be followed by an US of the lower extremity veins (and a followup US if the intial test is negative). If both US examinations are negative, the patient can be clinically followed.

3. Patients with significant heart or lung disease and inadequate CPR are at a high risk of fatal outcome from a recurrent PTE. Therefore, the presence or absence of PTE must be established with the greatest possible confidence in these patients. Presently there is no consensus about the best initial screening test. The randomized trial in progress is designed to test the role of HCCT vs. V/Q scanning. Of course, if the patient has clinical evidence of DVT, US of the lower extremity should be the initial test. Perhaps, based on the published material which reports a higher probability of detecting thrombi in the pulmonary vasculature, HCCT may be a better initial screening test. However, at this point the negative predictive value of HCCT is not known. In contrast to the patients with adequate CPR, the presence of subsegemental PTE may be important in this group of patients; unfortunately, this may not be diagnosable either by V/Q scanning or HCCT. Therefore, if HCCT does not show PTE and venous US is negative, pulmonary angiography should be performed to confidently exclude PTE.

The above recommendations are also in accordance with the suggestion from Society of Thoracic Radiology as well as the European Society of Thoracic Imaging.


We are still recruiting patients for the randomized trial. The entry criterion for a patient is the clinical suspicion of acute PTE. We request your cooperation in referring patients for this study. If you have a patient suitable for the study, please contact Dr. Keith Willie (UAB beeper # 6892).

Top of Page

FAQS: Frequently Asked Questions

 

 

Fig 3. The value of HCCT in the diagnosis of PE when a pulmonary infiltrate is present. HCCT scans through the right lower lobe, a. lung window, (b) mediastinal window. The extensive air space opacity in the right lower lobe is well seen in (a). A V/Q scan in this patient may have been indeterminate, because the large pulmonary infiltrate would have resulted in a matched defect. The HCCT clearly demonstrates the embolus in the lobar artery, extending into the segmental branches of the lower lobe.

Q: How does Helical Chest CT (HCCT) detect pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE)?

HCCT is essentially a contrast enhanced CT of the chest; therefore, excellent opacification of central, lobar, and proximal segmental arteries can be achieved by this technique. Thus, a PTE is recognized as an intraluminal filling defect, which is analogous to the diagnosis by a pulmonary angiogram which also demonstrates the embolus in the pulmonary arteries. This is more specific than V/Q scan in which the diagnosis of PTE is inferred from a ventilation/perfusion mismatch.

Q: When is HCCT indicated? Is it preferred over V/Q scanning?

Diagnosis of PTE is a relatively new indication for HCCT and there is much less experience with this technique compared to V/Q scanning. However, the positive predictive value of HCCT is very high and the test is less often indeterminate than V/Q scan. Therefore, HCCT may be preferred when significant pulmonary or pleural abnormalities are present which are more likely to result in an indeterminate V/Q scan, or when a ventilation scan may not be possible (e.g., patients on ventilatory support). In some patients, HCCT will demonstrate an alternate explanation, other than PTE, for the patient's symptoms.

Q: Are any patients unsuitable for HCCT?

Satisfactory opacification of the pulmonary arteries is essential for the diagnosis of PTE by this technique. This requires the use of intravenous contrast (about 120 ml), injected at a rate of 2-3 ml/sec and rapid sequential scanning. Therefore, a good study needs a good venous access and the patient's ability to hold breath for 30-40 seconds or at the least able to breath quietly for 30-40 seconds. Central venous lines are not well suited for this purpose. Very tachypneic patients or those on ventilator in whom the mechanical ventilation can not be suspended for about 30 seconds are not good candidates for this examination.

Q: What are the limitations of HCCT in the diagnosis of PTE?

At present, the HCCT cannot consistently demonstrate emboli in pulmonary arteries beyond the segmental level. Therefore, the negative predictive value of the HCCT is presently not known; a few published studies suggest that patients with adequate cardiopulmonary reserve, normal lower extremity venous ultrasound examination, and negative HCCT can be clinically followed with out anticoagulation. The randomized trial in progress at UAB is designed to provide more data to answer this question.

Q: How should I manage a patient in whom HCCT did not demonstrate PTE?

In about 5% of patients the examination is technically inadequate; we always describe this in our report. Unfortunately, the examination can not be immediately repeated due to the need for a moderate dose of intravenous contrast medium. In such patients, other algorithms for assessment of PTE should be followed.
Ultrasound examination of the lower extremity venous system for signs of DVT should be the next imaging technique in majority of the patients, certainly those with adequate cardiopulmonary reserve. If the test is negative, ACCP recommends a followup examination within a week. If both the tests are normal, a patient with adequate cardiac and pulmonary function may be followed clinically. However, in patients with inadequate cardiopulmonary reserve, because of higher risk of death in the event of a recurrent PTE, we strongly recommend pulmonary angiography to exclude PTE unless an alternate cause for the patient's symptoms and signs is found.

Top of Page

Transcatheter Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

 

 Interventional Radiology's newest angiography suite is now installed and in use.

Interventional Radiologists have a history of successfully treating acute pelvic bleeding secondary to a variety of obstetrical and gynecologic problems. This has been achieved by embolization of the anterior division of the hypogastric artery and specifically, embolization of the uterine arteries. Decrease in size of uterine fibroids has been observed in patients who have undergone transcatheter embolization for acute uterine bleeding. This finding has resulted in Interventional Radiologists evaluating this procedure as an alternative treatment for uterine fibroids.

Review of the literature shows that transcatheter embolization of the uterine artery as treatment for uterine fibroids is safe and effective. Many cases have been done in ongoing series, which have shown few complications. The most severe complication has been development of uterine infection requiring hysterectomy in 1&endash;2% cases. Improvement in pelvic symptoms related to uterine fibroids has been reported in 80&endash;85% of patients.

We are currently offering transcatheter embolization of the uterine arteries as a treatment alternative for patients with uterine fibroids who do not desire surgery. Patients must have an adequate work-up performed by a referring gynecologist as well as indicated imaging studies. Patients are admitted the morning of the procedure and discharged the next day.

If you would like further information about this procedure contact Drs. Saddekni, Hamrick or Oser in the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology at 975-4850.


Vsions  is published quarterly by the University of Alabama Hospital, Department of Radiology. Professor and Chairman: Robert J. Stanley, MD, Vice-Chairman for Operations and Academic Affairs: Robert E. Koehler, MD, Vice Chairman for Planning and Administration: Lincoln L. Berland, MD, Director of Outpatient Services: Peter Dempsey, MD. Visions Staff - Managing Editor: Pat Moore. Editors/Writers: Lincoln L. Berland, MD, Rachel Oser, MD, Robert Lopez, MD. Web Master: J. Kevin Smith, MD, PhD. Creative Services Staff - Editor: Jo Lynn Orr. Art Director: Jason Bickell. Please direct questions, comments, and suggestions as follows: Attention Angie French or Lincoln L. Berland, MD. Fax: 975-7213 Address: NHB 623B E-Mail lberland@uabmc.edu UAB Radiology Home Page: www.rad.uab.edu