|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is Our Mouse Trap? |
in the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism |
Helical Chest CT |
|
|
|
FAQS: Frequently Asked Questions
|
|
|
Fig 3. The value of HCCT in the diagnosis of PE when a pulmonary infiltrate is present. HCCT scans through the right lower lobe, a. lung window, (b) mediastinal window. The extensive air space opacity in the right lower lobe is well seen in (a). A V/Q scan in this patient may have been indeterminate, because the large pulmonary infiltrate would have resulted in a matched defect. The HCCT clearly demonstrates the embolus in the lobar artery, extending into the segmental branches of the lower lobe. |
|
Q: How does Helical Chest CT (HCCT) detect pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE)? |
HCCT is essentially a contrast enhanced CT of the chest; therefore, excellent opacification of central, lobar, and proximal segmental arteries can be achieved by this technique. Thus, a PTE is recognized as an intraluminal filling defect, which is analogous to the diagnosis by a pulmonary angiogram which also demonstrates the embolus in the pulmonary arteries. This is more specific than V/Q scan in which the diagnosis of PTE is inferred from a ventilation/perfusion mismatch. |
|
Q: When is HCCT indicated? Is it preferred over V/Q scanning? |
Diagnosis of PTE is a relatively new indication for HCCT and there is much less experience with this technique compared to V/Q scanning. However, the positive predictive value of HCCT is very high and the test is less often indeterminate than V/Q scan. Therefore, HCCT may be preferred when significant pulmonary or pleural abnormalities are present which are more likely to result in an indeterminate V/Q scan, or when a ventilation scan may not be possible (e.g., patients on ventilatory support). In some patients, HCCT will demonstrate an alternate explanation, other than PTE, for the patient's symptoms. |
|
Q: Are any patients unsuitable for HCCT? |
Satisfactory opacification of the pulmonary arteries is essential for the diagnosis of PTE by this technique. This requires the use of intravenous contrast (about 120 ml), injected at a rate of 2-3 ml/sec and rapid sequential scanning. Therefore, a good study needs a good venous access and the patient's ability to hold breath for 30-40 seconds or at the least able to breath quietly for 30-40 seconds. Central venous lines are not well suited for this purpose. Very tachypneic patients or those on ventilator in whom the mechanical ventilation can not be suspended for about 30 seconds are not good candidates for this examination. |
|
Q: What are the limitations of HCCT in the diagnosis of PTE? |
At present, the HCCT cannot consistently demonstrate emboli in pulmonary arteries beyond the segmental level. Therefore, the negative predictive value of the HCCT is presently not known; a few published studies suggest that patients with adequate cardiopulmonary reserve, normal lower extremity venous ultrasound examination, and negative HCCT can be clinically followed with out anticoagulation. The randomized trial in progress at UAB is designed to provide more data to answer this question. |
|
Q: How should I manage a patient in whom HCCT did not demonstrate PTE? |
In about 5% of patients the examination is technically
inadequate; we always describe this in our report.
Unfortunately, the examination can not be immediately
repeated due to the need for a moderate dose of intravenous
contrast medium. In such patients, other algorithms for
assessment of PTE should be followed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Interventional Radiologists have a history of successfully treating acute pelvic bleeding secondary to a variety of obstetrical and gynecologic problems. This has been achieved by embolization of the anterior division of the hypogastric artery and specifically, embolization of the uterine arteries. Decrease in size of uterine fibroids has been observed in patients who have undergone transcatheter embolization for acute uterine bleeding. This finding has resulted in Interventional Radiologists evaluating this procedure as an alternative treatment for uterine fibroids. Review of the literature shows that transcatheter embolization of the uterine artery as treatment for uterine fibroids is safe and effective. Many cases have been done in ongoing series, which have shown few complications. The most severe complication has been development of uterine infection requiring hysterectomy in 1&endash;2% cases. Improvement in pelvic symptoms related to uterine fibroids has been reported in 80&endash;85% of patients. We are currently offering transcatheter embolization of the uterine arteries as a treatment alternative for patients with uterine fibroids who do not desire surgery. Patients must have an adequate work-up performed by a referring gynecologist as well as indicated imaging studies. Patients are admitted the morning of the procedure and discharged the next day. If you would like further information about this procedure contact Drs. Saddekni, Hamrick or Oser in the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology at 975-4850. |
|
Vsions is published quarterly by the University of Alabama Hospital, Department of Radiology. Professor and Chairman: Robert J. Stanley, MD, Vice-Chairman for Operations and Academic Affairs: Robert E. Koehler, MD, Vice Chairman for Planning and Administration: Lincoln L. Berland, MD, Director of Outpatient Services: Peter Dempsey, MD. Visions Staff - Managing Editor: Pat Moore. Editors/Writers: Lincoln L. Berland, MD, Rachel Oser, MD, Robert Lopez, MD. Web Master: J. Kevin Smith, MD, PhD. Creative Services Staff - Editor: Jo Lynn Orr. Art Director: Jason Bickell. Please direct questions, comments, and suggestions as follows: Attention Angie French or Lincoln L. Berland, MD. Fax: 975-7213 Address: NHB 623B E-Mail lberland@uabmc.edu UAB Radiology Home Page: www.rad.uab.edu |